PDA

View Full Version : [RPG]: Dweomercraft: Familiars, reviewed by NPC Jeremy (4/5)


RPGnet Reviews
04-02-2004, 12:00 AM
http://www.rpg.net/reviews/archive/10/10223.phtml

Jeremy Reaban's Summary:

Ever want a penguin as a familiar in your D&D game? How about a koala bear? Or a loon? Or flying skull? Or a chipmunk? Or maybe an ooze is more your style. This book provides fairly exhaustive coverage of familiars for the d20 system, with well over a 100 of just about every type imaginable, as well as related rules and advice.

Go to the full review (http://www.rpg.net/reviews/archive/10/10223.phtml) for more information.

RPGnet Reviews
04-02-2004, 06:21 AM
Post originally by Elicia Davenport at 2004-04-02 06:21:25
Converted from Phorums BB System

Where does the word dweomer come from? Is it a made up word or is it a loan word from another language (like mana)?

RPGnet Reviews
04-02-2004, 07:33 AM
Post originally by Geo. W. Bush at 2004-04-02 07:33:29
Converted from Phorums BB System

It's derived from an Old English word for magic,
http://www.gregorpurdy.com/gregor/wow/000438.html

RPGnet Reviews
04-02-2004, 09:17 AM
Post originally by committed hero at 2004-04-02 09:17:56
Converted from Phorums BB System

Blame original D&D for dredging this world up from its Saxon grave.

RPGnet Reviews
04-02-2004, 09:19 AM
Post originally by committed hero at 2004-04-02 09:19:46
Converted from Phorums BB System

You sir, are an anti-quasite and an anti-penguinist (or anti-unfunny-comicite, I can't tell which).

RPGnet Reviews
04-02-2004, 09:45 PM
Post originally by Kamard the Jackalgod at 2004-04-02 21:45:08
Converted from Phorums BB System

committed hero wrote:
-------------------------------
Blame original D&D for dredging this world up from its Saxon grave.

Not- Blame Tolkien.

RPGnet Reviews
04-03-2004, 02:47 AM
Post originally by Andrew Pearce at 2004-04-03 02:47:01
Converted from Phorums BB System

Just so you know.

RPGnet Reviews
04-03-2004, 07:27 PM
Post originally by Wyvern at 2004-04-03 19:27:02
Converted from Phorums BB System

Er, *what's* Mongoose's? If you mean the book itself, you're getting it confused with <i>Encyclopedia Arcane: Familiars</i>. I haven't seen either book myself, but from the reviews I've read my impression is that it has fewer new choices of familiars than this one, but more options for what you can actually *do* with your famliars. I was actually hoping that someone who'd read both books could offer some further insight into how they compare.

Wyvern


"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
- William Shakespeare, "Hamlet"

RPGnet Reviews
04-03-2004, 09:12 PM
Post originally by ugh at 2004-04-03 21:12:19
Converted from Phorums BB System

No, the reviewer tried to use "mongeese" as the plural of "mongoose" as a type of familiar. Andrew was expaining what the proper plural form is.

RPGnet Reviews
04-06-2004, 12:48 AM
Post originally by Wyvern at 2004-04-06 00:48:43
Converted from Phorums BB System

ugh wrote:
-------------------------------
No, the reviewer tried to use "mongeese" as the plural of "mongoose" as a type of familiar. Andrew was expaining what the proper plural form is.
-------------------------------
Guess that's what I get for reading the forums without fully reading the review first. That said, I'd still be interested in a comparison of the two books. ^_^

Wyvern

RPGnet Reviews
04-07-2004, 10:54 PM
Post originally by Jeremy at 2004-04-07 22:54:42
Converted from Phorums BB System

Yes, I know, but I prefer to say mongeese. It's actually common enough that it's probably just as acceptable.

(For instance, if you search on Yahoo for "Mongooses", I get 22,000 pages. If I do one for "Mongeese", I get 6,500.

RPGnet Reviews
04-07-2004, 10:55 PM
Post originally by Jeremy at 2004-04-07 22:55:43
Converted from Phorums BB System

I love penguins, heck, I like Opus, I just wish his new comic was funny (but it's not very)

RPGnet Reviews
04-17-2004, 07:31 AM
Post originally by woodelf at 2004-04-17 07:31:31
Converted from Phorums BB System

> Rodents. Lots and lots of rodents. Mostly cute
> ones, chipmunks, chinchillas, ferrets,
> weasels, squirrels, mongeese, minks. But also
> opossums (possibly nature's saddest creature,
> though surprisingly human like, especially
> their hands), rats, lemmings, and mice. (Among
> others).

Ferrets, weasels, and mongoose are mustelids, and have basically nothing in common with rodents (in behavior, anatomy, or ecological niche). Opossums aren't rodents either--they're marsupials.

So, is this your mistake or theirs? Does the book make mistakes on the basics of the real-world animals, or were you just being succinct/sloppy in your review? And while you're at it, are any other domestic animals included as familiars--there's no such thing is a wild ferret [black-footed ferret is a completely different species]--or is it just housecat, ferret, and wild animals?

RPGnet Reviews
04-26-2004, 08:03 AM
Post originally by aga at 2004-04-26 08:03:56
Converted from Phorums BB System


How do you pronounce the word "dweomer"?