Post originally by Loz at 2003-08-06 10:37:38
Converted from Phorums BB System

Sergio, I deliberately stated that I wouldn't post anymore on this subject to see what your response would be. I expected a drawn-out, fractious, self-justifying, pseudo-academic return posting. Precisely what I got.

I believe you have difficulty accepting criticism of your own criticisms. This has been demonstrated in previous reviews you've posted. I don't wish to provoke or prolong arguments with you, and I hope that this reply, whilst seeming to do precisely what I've just said I DON'T want to do, brings an end to it.

Please accept that there are different intepretations and that Strength can be just as applicable a base as Dexterity for skills like Jumping and Swimming. We're not debating philosophy or life-death, we're debating the mechanics of a bloody roleplaying game which, in this crazy old world doesn't amount to a whole hill of beans.

<<In ballet movement is made for movement's sake. The focus is on its grace.>>

Oh, and by the way, in ballet, the idea is to interpret the music and provide emotional expression via dance. And to entertain an audience. The last thing movement is used for is for its own sake.

Please Sergio, let the matter rest now. Before you really show yourself up.