Post originally by Bellman at 2003-12-16 00:17:42
Converted from Phorums BB System

I'm a little confused here. You mentioned at the outset that this was a bad product:

"Crusade of Ashes takes on the story's metaplot head-on, and looses, in a big time way."

And:

"[Crusade of Ashes] levels the playing field, in a bad way. Really bad."

But don't actually tell us why...

What is it that makes this such a bad book?