|
Some random integral sexism for you
Post originally by Fulsrush at 2003-12-30 04:06:21
Converted from Phorums BB System
Okay, how about this for sexism integral to the language?
Picking a female name at random: Judy. Okay, it's not random, I've just never met a Judy before.
Judy has a book.
So, it's Judy's book.
Which, when you actually look at it, is sexist to the point that it's inaccurate.
The possessive apostrophe isn't actually doing a different job to what it does in "isn't" or "o'er". It's still representing missing letters, in this case, "hi".
Historically, "Judy's book" was "Judy his book".
Judy'r book?
|