View Single Post
 
Old 07-11-2004, 09:36 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: King Arthur ... Non-Malory versions

Post originally by The Ent at 2004-07-11 08:36:09
Converted from Phorums BB System


...but, then, the Arthur Mythos isn't really supposed to be...

I liked MoA a lot, but it's been years and years since I read it.

The mini-series might be a better bet. The knights at least look pretty historically accurate in it (even down to the more or less Late Roman helmets).

And, yes, some of what I liked about MoA is that the author sometimes gives a respectful nod to the various 19th/early 20th English "Myths" about Arthur, the various "old peoples" of Britain etc. Not excessively, mind, but still...
Reply With Quote