View Single Post
 
Old 09-14-2004, 09:18 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Why Didn't Rome "Fall?"

Post originally by Bill at 2004-09-14 08:18:01
Converted from Phorums BB System


hmm, I will try to summarize. The short-short version, improved communication via magic, the ability to move troops faster, an increased civic policy of social inclusion and certain magical/technological advances relieving social pressures.

You could have a very long thread on why the Roman Empire fell in actual history. Basically, to give an example of some of the major factors, debasement of coinage and uncontrollable inflation are controlled with the advent of better mining technology augmented by magic and the ability to process those ores. Some basic distribution capabilities aid this (the ability to preserve food stuffs indefinitely, better utilize roads) and a development of better understanding of economy.

Communication, the ability to contact cities across the Empire via the Crystallus Visio, means that much of the need to move the capital from Rome to Constantinople is removed. I realize much of the driving force for the move was also economic (much of the wealth of the Empire was in the east) but the west finds new wealth in a new industry, paper. Stability through faster and magically fortified legions also help in the maintaining of the west.

The above are all augmented by a more inclusive strategy of social inclusion giving those outside Rome a greater say in their own governance. This again leads to greater stability. It is also why Roma Imperious has a much broader (i.e. it is not just a book about Rome) scope. In addition, the above conditions create Emperors who are more competent, more dedicated to the Empire. This last part is of course pure speculation but it is a fantasy RPG. ;-D

Again, I could go on for pages but this is the gist. Hopefully I have answered your questions. I can’t point to one event and say that is why. Magic plays a part but no more than some very important alternate social aspects.

Bill
Reply With Quote