Post originally by Conan at 2005-03-01 14:23:18
Converted from Phorums BB System

You are welcome to that opinion. But I don't know James Earwicker at all, the books were sent to me as a reviewer for me to read and critique. I did that, and I expressed my opinion.

I do not at any point make a personal attack at James Earwicker individually - all my comments are in relation to the book and to get across how poorly executed it is.

The occasions that you mentioned clearly state that the book gives a certain impression - and I stand by my comments. If you decide to read more into my review than is there - that's up to you. But I simply don't see any viscious knife twisting - because there is none.

Conan