Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dan Davenport
Hmm. I can understand your feelings, but I think you're drawing an association based so strongly on a personal experience that I don't think it can really be considered a fair criticism of the book: "X says Y and X says Z. A also says Y, so A also implies Z."
To give you an example, it seems like taking offense at a discussion of hypodermic needle sterilization techniques because you heard heroine addicts talking about the subject.
|
Sure. That's why I said a thousand other people would disagree with me. However, the language and observations still fit with the militia mind set (at least with the people I have met). In essence, my aversion to the text does not necessarily negate my observation of the text. Again, I'll say the language fit the book. However, fitting or not, I didn't like it.