Quote:
Originally Posted by One Horse Town
Bugger it. I said that i wouldn't come back in here. I've spoken to Lev and sent a PM to an admin about this. Considering subsequent threads here, I find it difficult to believe the answer from the former and haven't reveived one from the later.
After stating that he had bought 35 copies of Runequest 3 on a thread in TTO (i can't find the thread).
Feb. 19th Lev's livejournal
I recently purchased all the remaining stock of RuneQuest3 items from Military Simulations and eight archive boxes of games has just arrived from Queenland. That makes roughly 35 boxes worth of games all told. I think I'm about reading to start my online gaming and publishing store
EDIT: Feb 23rd Runequest 3rd review menitioned on blog that it has gone up here. Last line of review saying "Get yourself a copy"
Subsequent ad&d reviews are a bit derogatory, but hey, that's opinion for you. Large debates, lots of interest and controversy. However, frequent references to RQ as a superior game in contrast to ad&d...
I might be waaay off base here, but something about the whole timing of this whole affair rings alarm bells with me.
|
Tsk. Shame on you.
SHAME ON YOU.
Especially making such insinuitions
after I had informed you that over ended up purchasing less than half the advertised copies of RQ3 because I had a big enough mouth to tell other people on some RQ lists (5 sold in NZ, 5 in Switzerland and the others all over the place)
AND I told you that I wouldn't be offering those for public sale but only to the people I directly game with
AND after I offered to sell you an AD&D1e Players Handbook which is available for public purchase.
So get this right; the game I gaving the highest rating for thus far IS NOT FOR SALE, but the game I've given the lower rating for IS.
Does that sound like someone drumming up business or someone giving their honest opinion?