Quote:
Originally Posted by Lev Lafayette
Tsk. Shame on you. SHAME ON YOU.
Especially making such insinuitions after I had informed you that over ended up purchasing less than half the advertised copies of RQ3 because I had a big enough mouth to tell other people on some RQ lists (5 sold in NZ, 5 in Switzerland and the others all over the place) AND I told you that I wouldn't be offering those for public sale but only to the people I directly game with AND after I offered to sell you an AD&D1e Players Handbook which is available for public purchase.
So get this right; the game I gaving the highest rating for thus far IS NOT FOR SALE, but the game I've given the lower rating for IS.
Does that sound like someone drumming up business or someone giving their honest opinion?
|
The direction of these threads had been what swayed me to post again Lev.
On sober reflection and after Old Scratch's comments, i should have kept it to myself. I dislike the idea of any kind of conflict of interests.
If i'm joined the dots up incorrectly, then all i can do is offer you a sincere apology for my asshattery last night. You're giving up your time to write reviews and that's great. I've let my annoyance at some of your comments colour my opinions of your integrity in this matter.
I should have taken you at face value, but something kept niggling at me...probably that chip on my shoulder. Anyhow, accept my apology, and i'll not show my face in a thread of yours from here on in.
Hopefully, that settles the matter.