|
Re: [RPG]: Arms Law & Claw Law (1st and 2nd ed), reviewed by Lev Lafayette (2/2)
Lev, I really enjoy these reviews.
One suggestion: In future, I'd love to see you comment on how subsequent editions and products addressed challenges you identify in the core products. For instance, how did subsequent editions of Arms Law/Rolemaster address the lack of cohesion you identify in the first edition?
I know that, strictly speaking, such commentary is outwith the scope of a review of a first edition product. But for my purposes, as someone who is largely interested in these reviews for historical purposes, it would be interesting to see some commentary on how design decisions (good and bad) made in these early products affected the publishing history of the roleplaying industry.
Keep up the good work!
Cheers,
SR.
|