|

04-16-2007, 06:00 PM
|
 |
Lawful Good Anarchist
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,212
|
|
|
Re: [RPG]: Dungeons & Dragons Basic Game, reviewed by privateer (5/5)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay
I'd say every way but one, and it's a major one: it's very, very limited. The old Red Box was a (mostly) complete role-playing game, while the new box is just the equivalent to a fancy introductory chapter. That said, it's a VERY fancy introductory chapter, and the minis are what's really special about it.
|
That's the answer to the question that came to my mind as well from the review. I had a very clear idea about the status of the physical components, the presentation and the various goodies but I was less clear on the 'substance' aspect. Assuming that this is a watered down version of the D&D3.x rules, how watered down is it? Basic D&D (Moldvay/Cook) did provide a complete game. How does this compare?
__________________
+1 Pithy from riprock +1 Laugh Point from rpg_dad
My Livejournal
Currently playing: RuneQuest 3e Classic Prax, GURPS Krononauts, Rolemaster Cyradon, Lords of Creation Horn of Roland, Pathfinder Fantasy Australia, Powers & Perils Perilous Lands, HeroQuest Mystara, HeroQuest Glorantha, New World of Darkness BrisVegas, Dragon Warriors Clyster
Free, quarterly, RPG magazine: RPG Review. Fifth issue out now! Dan 'Smif' Smith Interview & Art, New World of Darkness Review and Scenario, GURPS Krononauts, GURPS Languages, Swordbearer and Heroes of Olympus Retrospective plus Odyssey Scenario, Travel and Transport in Paranoia, Reliance on NPCs, Via Negativia II, Fallout 3 Review, District 9 Review, Mingshi's Industry News, Lord Orcus's Advice Column
|