As with any 5/5 review, the first impression is "oh no, not another advert or fanboi" as rpg.net is infamous for.
But the amount and quality of the review's information and analysis is certainly of a higher level than that.
So, for the game's first rpg.net review, it is fairly okay - I give it a 3–/3+. I would still like to see more on actual details, and more importantly, more attention to the criticism part of the review. As it is, it
is overly enthusiastic, thus the 3– for Style.
Only by showing what's bad can you give the reader enough information to make up his or her
own mind of whether the product is worth its grade, especially if that grade is a lofty 5/5.
But something's telling me there are more reviews of this particular product in the pipeline...!
