Quote:
Originally Posted by ArchibaldGant
Because obviously both sides in the US are not equally obnoxious... thank you for confirming my suspicion that you're upholding a delusional double standard here.
|
Pot? There's a Kettle trying to reach you on Line 2...
No, wrong analogy. Neo-Samurai would have to be upholding a delusional double standard for it to be valid.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArchibaldGant
No one said this isn't a real review. They said it was a bad review, namely because they found the points it made were poorly conceived. It's criticism. You can't praise criticism in one direction and condemn it from another.
|
It’s not stopping you from doing the exact same thing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArchibaldGant
First of all, I don't care what games you play. As I've said a million times, people should play what they find fun, just as they shouldn't judge games they haven't played.
|
Way to shoot down your own argument. This was a playtest review.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArchibaldGant
But the bolded part gets to exactly my point: the utter condescension and self-importance of the 4E detractors. I realize you're upset that others can't handle dissent because you can't handle dissent yourself, but the utterly trivial and pointless reasons for not even trying 4E ("someone was mean to me on the interwebz!!!1") is exactly what makes reviews like this seem so petty and asinine.
|
Funny, most of the delusion and self-importance I'm hearing is coming from D&D4
fans like you, who hurl derision upon anyone who dares to criticize WotC's new D&D. Personally, I like what I've seen of the game (haven't played it yet), but having people coming online and mudslinging reviewers who don't like the game just gives fans like me a bad name. Kindly cut it out.