RPGnet
Reviews | Game Index | Forums | Press | Wiki | Columns | Store
 

Go Back   RPGnet Forums > RPGnet Appendix > RPGnet Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 7 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-08-2003, 01:00 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
[RPG]: Fiend Folio, reviewed by Mike MacKenzie (5/5)

http://www.rpg.net/reviews/archive/9/9216.phtml

Mike MacKenzie's Summary:

The 3E D&D Field Folio is one of the best, if not the best, single monster-product I have yet seen for the d20 system.

Go to the full review for more information.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-08-2003, 12:57 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Excellent review

Post originally by Anders at 2003-04-08 11:57:56
Converted from Phorums BB System


Thanks for the review; it's informative and very interresting to read. It's good that you distinguish between the various possible applications of the book, so that it's possible to make up one's mind about whether or not it is usefull.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-08-2003, 02:11 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
No Flumph?

Post originally by Frank Sronce at 2003-04-08 13:11:33
Converted from Phorums BB System


Darn, and I was hoping to be able to apply a bunch of templates and make a "Killer Fiendish Were-Flumph of Doom!"

Too bad.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-08-2003, 03:12 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Excellent review

Post originally by Brian Cooksey at 2003-04-08 14:12:49
Converted from Phorums BB System


I agree. Great job! You answered nearly all of the questions I had about this product. This was well organized and very clear. Thanks for the detailed information on the templates, grafts, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-08-2003, 03:19 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Solid!

Post originally by Wes Johnson at 2003-04-08 14:19:24
Converted from Phorums BB System


Solid review! Could not think of any questions to ask after reading it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-08-2003, 03:54 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: No Flumph?

Post originally by Nikosandros at 2003-04-08 14:54:51
Converted from Phorums BB System


Fear not! The Flumph is already here! You'll just have to buy Tome of Horrors by Necromancer Games...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-08-2003, 10:34 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Grafts?

Post originally by The Mirrorball Man at 2003-04-08 21:34:35
Converted from Phorums BB System


Wes Johnson wrote:
-------------------------------
Solid review! Could not think of any questions to ask after reading it.

I can think of one or two questions: what are symbionts? What are grafts? Are we supposed to know?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-09-2003, 01:14 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Names

Post originally by Dan at 2003-04-09 00:14:19
Converted from Phorums BB System


Hrm, it looks like some of the names are just as bad as in the original Fiend Folio (which even articles in Dragon magazine made fun of when it came out).

Xerfilstyx? They can't be serious...

Caryatid Columns are probably still misnamed, if they apply to female figures.

Maelephant? Yeesh.

And then it's pretty funny that the review makes fun of the word "bhut" for a new ghost-like undead, since it's not only tons better than the vast majority of other names listed in the review, but is actually a real-word term used to refer to ghosts in India.

Without seeing the book, I won't know if the monsters are any good, if the stats make sense, or if there's enough info about each to run them well. But at least it's clear that a good portion of the creatures would have to be renamed to make sense in a campaign.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-09-2003, 02:14 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Names

Post originally by Gez at 2003-04-09 01:14:52
Converted from Phorums BB System


Xerfilstyx -- they probably wanted to make the Styx association less obvious.

Maelephant -- this comes from Planescape. It's the evil twin of the Holyphant. The holyphant was probably started as a joke, and the maelephant was made later just because.

About caryatids, why would they be misnamed ?

"caryatid , a sculptured female figure serving as an ornamental support in place of a column or pilaster. It was a frequently used motif in architecture, furniture, and garden sculpture during the Renaissance, the 18th cent., and notably, the classic revival of the 19th cent., when caryatids were popular as mantelpiece supports. The motif appeared in Egyptian and Greek architecture; the most celebrated example extant is the Porch of the Caryatids, forming part of the Erechtheum. Here six beautifully sculptured figures, acting as columns, support an entablature on their heads. Caryatids were used also in two small treasuries (6th cent. B.C.) at Delphi. Male supporting figures are called atlantes."
From http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/world/A0810668.html

"Caryatids were draped female figures used instead of columns to support the entablatures of temples. They are named after the women of a Spartan town (Karyai), according to Vitruvius.

The most famous caryatids are on the porch of the Erechtheum (420-415 BC), on the Acropolis.

They are sometimes called korai maidens."
From http://ancienthistory.about.com/library/bl/bl_caryatid.htm
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-09-2003, 02:17 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Grafts?

Post originally by Gez at 2003-04-09 01:17:32
Converted from Phorums BB System


Grafts and symbionts works like templates or magic items: you "plug" it on a creature, and said recipient gains something. Symbionts have a will of their own, grafts don't.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 1996-2006 RPGnet® and individual posters. Compilation copyright RPGnet.