RPGnet
Reviews | Game Index | Forums | Press | Wiki | Columns | Store
 

Go Back   RPGnet Forums > RPGnet Appendix > RPGnet Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-30-2003, 01:00 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
[RPG]: Monster Smackdown, reviewed by Evan Waters (5/4)

http://www.rpg.net/reviews/archive/9/9385.phtml

Evan Waters's Summary:

The BUFFY game keeps going strong, with a book that surpasses expectations of what a \"monster manual\" can be.

Go to the full review for more information.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-30-2003, 07:56 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Great review, Evan!

Post originally by Dan Davenport at 2003-05-30 06:56:43
Converted from Phorums BB System


Very comprehensive and objective -- exactly what I like in a review.

--
Dan Davenport
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-30-2003, 09:34 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Great review, Evan!

Post originally by Johnny McKenna at 2003-05-30 08:34:08
Converted from Phorums BB System


I'll agree. I've been impressed beyond measure with the quality of Eden's BUFFY line, and this review lets me know that they've released another fantastic product. You covered everything I'd want to know about it. Thanks!

--JKM
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-30-2003, 11:15 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Great review, Evan!

Post originally by Michael at 2003-05-30 10:15:08
Converted from Phorums BB System


Ditto. I don't play the game but it makes me want to.

Dan Davenport wrote:
-------------------------------
Very comprehensive and objective -- exactly what I like in a review.

--
Dan Davenport
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-30-2003, 12:52 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The one thing I don't like about "Buffy"

Post originally by atholbrose at 2003-05-30 11:52:27
Converted from Phorums BB System


...the whole shtick about holding content over for future volumes. I resent the carrot-dangling of content; if I'm happy with the way the books are coming along -- and for the most part, I am -- then I'll buy the successive volumes without the tempting.

As it is, though, I do resent it, and I still only own the base rulebook.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-30-2003, 01:26 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: The one thing I don't like about "Buffy&q

Post originally by Dan Davenport at 2003-05-30 12:26:12
Converted from Phorums BB System


atholbrose wrote:
-------------------------------
<b>...the whole shtick about holding content over for future volumes. I resent the carrot-dangling of content; if I'm happy with the way the books are coming along -- and for the most part, I am -- then I'll buy the successive volumes without the tempting.

As it is, though, I do resent it, and I still only own the base rulebook.</b>
-------------------------------

I understand your feelings, but I do think that Eden's been a lot better about this with Buffy than other game companies have been with their own properties. It seems to me that with Buffy, Eden went the Chaosium route: Put as much as possible in the core book, then expand upon specific areas in supplements. So, I'm not that concerned about them reserving certain subjects for their associated supplements.

Now, if they had given only vampire stats in the main book and had reserved other creatures for future supplements, for example -- <u>that</u> would have annoyed me.

--
Dan Davenport
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-30-2003, 07:00 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: The one thing I don't like about "Buffy&q

Post originally by ~BA at 2003-05-30 18:00:56
Converted from Phorums BB System


The fact that you can play the game entirely with the core book is an indication of its strengths. The supplements are added extras-- you don't need them to play the game. They don't add anything vital or required. Just a lot of cool extras.

In my own Buffy game, we just used the core book, despite owning the Slayer's Handbook and Monster Smackdown. The latter two were useful to have for ideas and more quotes, and a few extra system thingies.

~BA
pax
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-30-2003, 11:03 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: The one thing I don't like about "Buffy&q

Post originally by David Carroll at 2003-05-30 22:03:14
Converted from Phorums BB System


I have connections to Eden, so I'm hardly unbiased, but I'm not sure what the problem is. There is an enourmous amount of ground to cover, and when topics need more detail, they have been assigned to the most appropriate suppliment. Hence Vampire Willow in the monster book, and Magic Willow in the magic book. I'm sure it'd be nicer if everything came out at once, so there was no waiting, but I suspect even CJ and co aren't up to that :-)

Anyway, an interesting point,

David C
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-31-2003, 12:20 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: The one thing I don't like about "Buffy&q

Post originally by Gerry Saracco at 2003-05-30 23:20:08
Converted from Phorums BB System




atholbrose wrote:
-------------------------------
...the whole shtick about holding content over for future volumes. I resent the carrot-dangling of content; if I'm happy with the way the books are coming along -- and for the most part, I am -- then I'll buy the successive volumes without the tempting.

As it is, though, I do resent it, and I still only own the base rulebook.
-------------------------------


You don't need more than the rulebook to run the game. That is all we use (well ok, I use the Director's screen, but that is it), even though I own the Slayer's Handbook (which I bought simply to support Eden, not because I needed it for my game)

As for holding content: A few things spring to mind here:

A) Eden is a business, and well, for a business to stay that way, they need to have product out there. You can only sell so many copies of a core book, and no matter how complete they could try and make it, someone will find something that was left out.

B) Eden could only cover through Season 6, so anything left out from Season 7 is the fault of FOX, not Eden. Ergo, it wouldn't have been complete for the whole series anyway. I know for a fact FOX told Eden to hold off on doing much with the Watchers, since they wanted to wait and see if Ripper (the series featuring Giles, a co-production with the BBC) was going to take off or not. So certain things being left out was not of their doing.

C) You don't need any of the other books. Sure, the Slayer's Handbook and Monster Smackdown are considered "Core" books. However, they are full of optional material. You don't need the monster creation rules to spawn critters if you don't want. There is enough in the core rules to do so (inmho). As magic is so freeform, you don't need the Magic Box, which is full of spells from the show (which you probably don't really need, as others have made their own versions that can readily be found on the net) and options for customizing spellcasters a little more.

All the other books do is give you expanded options to run/play Buffy, nothing more. You don't ever have to buy anything past the core book.

That's my $0.02
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-31-2003, 04:49 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: The one thing I don't like about "Buffy&q

Post originally by Mant at 2003-05-31 03:49:44
Converted from Phorums BB System


I'm not sure what your complaint is.

No RPG line puts everything in the first suppliment, there isn't room.

So what would you rather, they tell you where stuff is going to be, or they don't? I mean, would you rather Monster Smackdown just didn't mention the Trio or Dark Willow at all?

Or is there something you would like taken out of it to fit them in?

Mant
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 1996-2006 RPGnet® and individual posters. Compilation copyright RPGnet.