RPGnet
Reviews | Game Index | Forums | Press | Wiki | Columns | Store
 

Go Back   RPGnet Forums > RPGnet Appendix > RPGnet Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-03-2003, 01:00 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
[Board/Tactical Game]: WarCraft: the Boardgame, reviewed by Robert Lionheart (3/4)

http://www.rpg.net/reviews/archive/9/9909.phtml

Robert Lionheart's Summary:

WarCraft: the Boardgame has very good gameplay that mimics the computer game with solid replay value, but the unrecognizable blobs of woods and obvious set-up for expansion sets are a bummer.

Go to the full review for more information.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-03-2003, 07:09 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
great game

Post originally by O'Keefe at 2003-12-03 06:09:07
Converted from Phorums BB System


I got to play a basic four player game recently. We had a lot of fun, even though we did turn order wrong, and messed up a few other rules.

We weren't as bothered by the "wooden blobs" but I don't see why Risk style pieces couldn't have been included.

My only real complaint is probably gonna come after a few games. It seems like the Night Elf players will usually dominate combat with fully upgraded ranged units. That's what happened in our game.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-03-2003, 08:51 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Some thoughts

Post originally by Mike Zebrowski at 2003-12-03 07:51:59
Converted from Phorums BB System


The wooden pieces seem to be the number one complaint about the game. Personally, I don't have a problem with them as it is a board game and not a miniatures game. Hopefully, FFG will be releasing an expansion that has miniatures.

The wordless cards do have some additional benefits. Their abilities can be changed by the scenario. Also, errata becomes more easy to implement.

Right now, several of the cards and the special abilities are unbalanced. Heal rules the battlefield, followed by Slow Poison.

The primary discussion on the Yahoo group concerns re-balancing the abilities. Once everthing is re-balanced, it is a simple matter of reprinting the back cover of the rule book and including it in future expansions (as well as online).

I did not find the rule book to be poorly written.

The game is not based on Warcraft 3. It is based on the entire series. Heroes and critters are only important in WC3. Also, the vast number of different units is pretty much unique to Warcraft 3. The first 2 installments had a very limited number of units.

Mike Z
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-03-2003, 12:05 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Just a quick, slightly pedantic, point..

Post originally by Mark Green at 2003-12-03 11:05:33
Converted from Phorums BB System


Settlers of Catan is by Claus Teuber, not Reiner Knizia.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-03-2003, 01:13 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: great game

Post originally by Cedric Chin at 2003-12-03 12:13:03
Converted from Phorums BB System


re: Night Elves

BoardGameGeek.com says this about the Night Elves as well. The strategy, apparently, is to attack them **before** they reach maximum upgrade. Orcs, in particular, should MELEE MELEE MELEE sooner than later.


Cedric.
aka. Washu! ^O^
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-03-2003, 01:14 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Some thoughts

Post originally by Cedric Chin at 2003-12-03 12:14:49
Converted from Phorums BB System


fwiw, The textless components allow the game to be published internationally. It allows the company to hold down costs.

BoardGameGeek.com still refers to the ranged units as "racing cars", tho. (:


Cedric.
aka. Washu! ^O^
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-03-2003, 03:27 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Nitpicking...

Post originally by Trevor at 2003-12-03 14:27:08
Converted from Phorums BB System


They call it Cyan and Magenta because those are the colors they are. Cyan is a combination of Blue and Green, and Magenta is a combination of Red and Blue. Both Cyan and Magenta are standard colors used in printing. To complain that they call something by its actual name is ludicrous.

Overall the entire review is laced with unnecessary bitterness and nitpicking. You'd think that sort of thing would be absent from a review that is actually recommending the product in question...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-04-2003, 01:11 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
outdone

Post originally by access.denied at 2003-12-04 12:11:07
Converted from Phorums BB System


It's Klaus Teuber, not Claus Teuber.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-05-2003, 09:59 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Nitpicking...

Post originally by Oni no Won at 2003-12-05 08:59:05
Converted from Phorums BB System


First of all, most boardgames that have a wargame feel, come with many detailed miniatures. It is almost expected. The other problem I have with the wooden pieces in this game is that all three races share the same shaped pieces to represent their forces. The final problem with the pieces is that there are no distinct pieces to represent upgraded units. They are only represented on the cards.

I don't think the author's reaction to the game was inappropriate. I believe he did a fair assessment of the game. Also, he has played the game and he is only expressing his as well as his friends' experience of the game.

I eagerly waited for this game but after hearing what others have said about this game, I think it will be put on the back burner so to speak.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-08-2003, 02:02 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: outdone

Post originally by Neph at 2003-12-08 01:02:20
Converted from Phorums BB System


He doesn't say it is, does he ?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 1996-2006 RPGnet® and individual posters. Compilation copyright RPGnet.