RPGnet
Reviews | Game Index | Forums | Press | Wiki | Columns | Store
 

Go Back   RPGnet Forums > RPGnet Appendix > RPGnet Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-09-2004, 01:00 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
[RPG]: Macho Women With Guns , reviewed by James Gillen (3/3)

http://www.rpg.net/reviews/archive/10/10019.phtml

James Gillen's Summary:

Why am I reviewing this? Because, dammit, somebody HAD to.

Go to the full review for more information.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-09-2004, 10:58 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dang it!

Post originally by Ralph Dula at 2004-01-09 09:58:58
Converted from Phorums BB System


Dang it, I wanted to be the first one to review the new MWWG! And after I finally convinced my players to go through the sample adventure this weekend...

I am kind of surprised you gave the book a 3 in Substance, though. I felt there was enough missing text, typos, cut and pastes of the same material over and over again, and other flaws that it would rate a 2 at best.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-09-2004, 11:31 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Dang it!

Post originally by James Gillen at 2004-01-09 10:31:46
Converted from Phorums BB System


That's why it wasn't any more than 3. I figured that the quality of the book itself and the use of layout made it acceptable.

JG
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-09-2004, 12:11 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Great review!

Post originally by Wes Johnson at 2004-01-09 11:11:53
Converted from Phorums BB System


A funny and complete review to boot! Nice one.

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-09-2004, 12:35 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Great review!

Post originally by unterhund at 2004-01-09 11:35:07
Converted from Phorums BB System


Seconded!




Uh, that's all.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-09-2004, 01:34 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Great review!

Post originally by SteelCaress at 2004-01-09 12:34:22
Converted from Phorums BB System


Good review, good reading, but you missed one little point:

I watched a lot of schlock in the 80's, as there was *a lot* of schlock produced then. And some of the funnier stuff I saw featured women in the army, women as assassins, alien warrior princesses on rollerblades (in a desert setting), etc. A lot of these "killer babes" were played by Playboy or Penthouse alumni, whose total lack of acting skills just made those movies even more hilarious.

I think the game, in part, was kind of a reaction to that.

Not that the game never appealed to the salivating gamer chauvinist pig in me...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-09-2004, 03:30 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Makes Sense

Post originally by Ralph Dula at 2004-01-09 14:30:44
Converted from Phorums BB System


Makes sense to me. Based on what I've read (and assuming playtesting doesn't change my opinions) I'm probably going to end up giving it a lower Substance but a higher Style than you. It's all a matter of how you look at how you interpret the Substance and Style ratings, I guess.

Good review, by the way. Sorry I forgot to mention that in my initial post.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-09-2004, 06:14 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Imperfections

Post originally by Darrin Kelley at 2004-01-09 17:14:21
Converted from Phorums BB System


The drops in the Zap Spells and the other mistakes in the book were rapidly given errata for on the Mongoose Message Forum.

I logged every bit of it and have it in a text file.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-09-2004, 09:38 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Great review!

Post originally by James Gillen at 2004-01-09 20:38:48
Converted from Phorums BB System


"Good review, good reading, but you missed one little point:

I watched a lot of schlock in the 80's, as there was *a lot* of schlock produced then. And some of the funnier stuff I saw featured women in the army, women as assassins, alien warrior princesses on rollerblades (in a desert setting), etc. A lot of these "killer babes" were played by Playboy or Penthouse alumni, whose total lack of acting skills just made those movies even more hilarious.

I think the game, in part, was kind of a reaction to that."

Gee, wonder why I never saw those things?
Well, the important question is, did Greg Porter?

JG
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-10-2004, 10:40 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Vehicle Damage

Post originally by 6inTruder at 2004-01-10 09:40:53
Converted from Phorums BB System


Does it still use the super-cool Vehicle Damage circuit-thingy from the old version?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 1996-2006 RPGnet® and individual posters. Compilation copyright RPGnet.