RPGnet
Reviews | Game Index | Forums | Press | Wiki | Columns | Store
 

Go Back   RPGnet Forums > RPGnet Appendix > RPGnet Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-13-2004, 01:00 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
[RPG]: HeroQuest: Roleplaying in Glorantha, reviewed by Deacon Blues (3/5)

http://www.rpg.net/reviews/archive/10/10090.phtml

Deacon Blues's Summary:

The HeroQuest core book is an encyclopedia of unique and fascinating information. You can pick up an encyclopedia and find very interesting articles, if you know where to look, but it doesn't make a good read cover-to-cover.

Go to the full review for more information.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-13-2004, 12:02 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Minor Details That I Got Wrong

Post originally by Deacon Blues at 2004-02-13 11:02:07
Converted from Phorums BB System


I realized, not long after I submitted this review, that I got a few minor bits wrong. None of them were large enough to change my overall verdict of HeroQuest, but I want to make sure people get the right idea.

The two big ones:

(1) The character who wants to invent surfing (weary sigh) is a Teshnite, not a Grazer; see Examples.

(2) I swapped the numbers for Fumble and Critical on the results chart; see Task Resolution.

(3) I meant to say "Hero Wars" when I said "Gods War" in Examples.

That's it, I think.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-13-2004, 12:32 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Long Time RuneQuester Seeks Fun-Loving Sedenya

Post originally by Decurio at 2004-02-13 11:32:33
Converted from Phorums BB System


As someone who played and loved RQ (and Glorantha) for years, I wanted to know from other gamers who played RQ and have switched to HQ what the trasition was like...I'm deeply tempted to pick up HQ simply because its Glorantha (and yes, boys and girls, Glorantha is the absolute blast to play in). Any thoughts?

(hopefully Wulf Corbett will see this...)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-13-2004, 12:40 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Minor Details That I Got Wrong

Post originally by PaulK at 2004-02-13 11:40:52
Converted from Phorums BB System


And the Esvulari are monotheists - not atheists.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-13-2004, 12:41 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Good Review!

Post originally by King of Old School at 2004-02-13 11:41:35
Converted from Phorums BB System


Thanks for posting it.

KoOS
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-13-2004, 01:08 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Minor Details That I Got Wrong

Post originally by Matthew Gabbert at 2004-02-13 12:08:41
Converted from Phorums BB System


Very nice review -- good job!

I agree with many of your points. The terminology, especially in the magic section, can be quite daunting, even though (thankfully) it is used pretty consistently.

I didn't have a problem with the tone of the examples -- Glorantha has always had a silly streak to it, despite the heroic/mythological setting. I actually found it to be a rather accurate assortment of player types. The Teshnan who wants to invent surfing is typical of some of the non-game breaking oddness that many players bring to a game. I think it was there in part to illustrate the game's GMing philosophy of saying "yes, but" rather than "no" to unexpected player ideas. The origami mage also brings to mind players I've met (more often women for some reason) who will never read the rule book or study the setting and just want to play something unusual that they come up with on the fly. The Tri-Lambs were goofy (as was their guardian), but Glorantha is full of anachronistic references and bad puns. And as for Mr. Fancypants, every GM I've ever known has complained of the way players will name or rename NPCs, usually to humorous (but possibly mood-disrupting) effect.

Anyway, thanks for writing an interesting review. I may point some of my non-HeroQuest acquainted friends towards it in the hope that one of them decides to run a game.

-- Matthew Gabbert
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-13-2004, 01:37 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Long Time RuneQuester Seeks Fun-Loving Sedenya

Post originally by Leon Kirshtein at 2004-02-13 12:37:48
Converted from Phorums BB System


My main problem with this system is that magic is so subjective. There are no definitions for what the spells do per se, you just make it up as you go along.

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-13-2004, 01:44 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Minor Details That I Got Wrong

Post originally by Mark Buckley at 2004-02-13 12:44:44
Converted from Phorums BB System



Ditto, I've read that Magic chapter several times, and I still don't understand it, there is specific terminology applied in there with no straightforward definition, at least as far as I can see.

Also agree on the examples, I found them really annoying, and no help at all for understanding the rules, which is a great shame.

Good review indeed.

Mark

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-13-2004, 01:49 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Long Time RuneQuester Seeks Fun-Loving Sedenya

Post originally by Matthew Gabbert at 2004-02-13 12:49:48
Converted from Phorums BB System


Some might say that makes it more "realistic" whatever that means. ;-)

-- Matthew Gabbert
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-13-2004, 02:12 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Good Review!

Post originally by Brand Robins at 2004-02-13 13:12:19
Converted from Phorums BB System


I second this motion. Well done.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 1996-2006 RPGnet® and individual posters. Compilation copyright RPGnet.