RPGnet
Reviews | Game Index | Forums | Press | Wiki | Columns | Store
 

Go Back   RPGnet Forums > RPGnet Appendix > RPGnet Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 13 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-25-2004, 01:00 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
[Book/Fiction]: Victorian Age Trilogy, reviewed by Jake (5/4)

http://www.rpg.net/reviews/archive/10/10134.phtml

Jake de Oude's Summary:

Game fiction doesn't have to be of inferior quality: Philippe Boulle proves that with this excellent trilogy. Apart from being a good read, the books can also serve as primers on Vampire and the Victorian Age. Highly recommended.

Go to the full review for more information.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-25-2004, 01:27 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
VA: A Morbid Initiation

Post originally by Delirium at 2004-02-25 12:27:40
Converted from Phorums BB System


Countervailing Opinion -

I read Book I (A Morbid Initiation) of the VA Trilogy last year, having found the Victorian Age Vampire:The Masquerade supplements released around the same time to be a good stab at a V:TM take on the era.

For me, the book confirmed almost all of the criticism I had heard about RP novel tie-ins. Formulaic, poorly characterised, plodding... awful, really. Sadly, it includes the requisite lesbian vampiric sex, which is as bad as you might imagine.

One to avoid.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-26-2004, 03:13 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
A few words to say...

Post originally by Cassander at 2004-02-26 02:13:43
Converted from Phorums BB System


“Begging your pardon, ma’am,” said ary, “but I trust those people not a whit.” Mary’s accent gave her judgment the semblance of a pronouncement from some medieval midwife or even, if one overlooked gender, a rural sheriff.

***

Perhaps my judgement is a little skewed, but I can't have been the only person to think that the writing style of the book was just plain awful. Take the above example, which descends into purple prose without meaning much. In it you have:

* The informed attribute. Instead of giving the character an accent, the reader is informed that they have an accent and that the accent gives the statement some kind of gravity.

* The redundancy. Do we need to know that the sheriff is a rural one, as opposed to an urban sheriff?

* The cultural misunderstanding. In England a sheriff was an important figure, a minor nobleman or suchlike and certainly not someone making rustic pronouncements.

* Pretentious rubbish. This should need no explanation.

Of course, most of the book isn't as bad as the paragraph above, but it isn't much better either. The book is a throwing together of cheap stereotypes that a hack writer of Victorian sensation fiction would be rightly ashamed of. It dwells unhealthily on sex and violence with the schlocky immoderation of an Italian B-movie. It just isn't good.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 1996-2006 RPGnet® and individual posters. Compilation copyright RPGnet.