RPGnet
Reviews | Game Index | Forums | Press | Wiki | Columns | Store
 

Go Back   RPGnet Forums > RPGnet Appendix > RPGnet Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-26-2004, 01:00 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
[Comic]: Supreme: The Story of the Year, reviewed by ShannonA (5/4)

http://www.rpg.net/reviews/archive/10/10347.phtml

Shannon Appelcline's Summary:

A supreme reconstruction of the Superman mythology by Alan Moore.

Go to the full review for more information.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-26-2004, 07:53 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Tom Strong, NOT Tom Tomorrow

Post originally by Gary Miles at 2004-05-26 06:53:46
Converted from Phorums BB System


Sorry, Shannon, but I just have to correct you. I think when you mentioned Tom Tommorow, I believe you were thinking of Tom Strong (my favorite of the ABC Comics lineup).

Gary
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-26-2004, 09:58 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
So THAT's how they changed Supreme. Weird...

Post originally by Dan Davenport at 2004-05-26 08:58:17
Converted from Phorums BB System


Excellent review, Shannon. So <u>that's</u> how they explained Supreme's 180-degree changeover... It still seems so weird, though -- taking a total deconstructionist hero and making him an archetypal REconstructionist hero. I mean, why not just start with a new character?

--
Dan Davenport
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-26-2004, 11:06 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: So THAT's how they changed Supreme. Weird...

Post originally by Emprint at 2004-05-26 10:06:57
Converted from Phorums BB System


<<It still seems so weird, though -- taking a total deconstructionist hero and making him an archetypal REconstructionist hero. I mean, why not just start with a new character?>>

I don't know, but it's worth considering that Watchmen started life as a deconstruction of the Charlton superheroes.

Moore's abruptly halted later work in this universe was good, too- the new Youngblood was quite entertaining, and the big crossover I'm blanking on the name of was cool, too.

Supreme remains one of my favorite pieces of comic book work ever- I like it as well as Watchmen, quite frankly.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-26-2004, 01:25 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: So THAT's how they changed Supreme. Weird...

Post originally by Shannon Appelcline at 2004-05-26 12:25:05
Converted from Phorums BB System


<i>I mean, why not just start with a new character?</i>

I'd guess Liefeld came up to Moore at a convention and said, "Hey, I'm breaking away from Image. Want to redesign my whole universe?" and Moore said, "Well, OK, if that's what you really want ..."

I'm sure both Moore & Liefled saw benefits out of the alliance. Moore got a really nice customer basis for his new reconstructionism, without having to go to either Marvel or DC, both of which he was feuding with at the time. Meanwhile, Liefeld got people to read his comics because, for the first time ever, he had an actual writer on board. (The only Supremes in my collection are those Alan Moore issues, v1 #41- v2 #6. I'm sure I'm not the only one for which that's true.)

Shannon
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-26-2004, 01:25 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Tom Strong, NOT Tom Tomorrow

Post originally by Shannon Appelcline at 2004-05-26 12:25:52
Converted from Phorums BB System


Yes.

I got confused between Tom Strong, Tom Strong's Tomorrow Tales, and Tom Tomorrow of This Modern World.

Shannon
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-26-2004, 01:29 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: So THAT's how they changed Supreme. Weird...

Post originally by Shannon Appelcline at 2004-05-26 12:29:11
Converted from Phorums BB System


<i>Supreme remains one of my favorite pieces of comic book work ever- I like it as well as Watchmen, quite frankly.</i>

I agree these first 12 issues were very good, but I thought his last 10 were solely average. They didn't have the strong focus and structure of the original run (hurt, no doubt, by the fact that they were published, and thus probably written, over a couple year span, with a couple of almost one-year gaps between issues).

The crossover, by-the-by, was Judgement Day, which is also out in trade paperback. Maybe the same folks will TPB all those random issues too; I'd love it, as they're the only ones of the set I haven't read before.

Shannon
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-26-2004, 03:31 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: So THAT's how they changed Supreme. Weird...

Post originally by Davies at 2004-05-26 14:31:12
Converted from Phorums BB System




<i>I'd guess Liefeld came up to Moore at a convention and said, "Hey, I'm breaking away from Image. Want to redesign my whole universe?" and Moore said, "Well, OK, if that's what you really want ..."</i>

Probably, except that they probably met in the green room, with Moore watching in mild awe and horror as Liefeld took several keys of coke up his nose and made all kinds of "suggestions" which Moore subsequently ignored.

Chris Davies.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-26-2004, 10:01 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Awesome Ent.

Post originally by Jason Carpenter at 2004-05-26 21:01:42
Converted from Phorums BB System


Awesome Entertainment did not go belly up because of poor accounting but because the primary source of fund, Jon Peters I believe, withdrew from Awesome Entertainment and took his money with him because he was expecting sales in the millions, which NO ONE had at the time. From there Rob ran the company out of pocket and even though he is a millionaire, it takes more than millions to run a successful comic book company, just ask Mark Allessi. For a late 90s company Awesome Ent. did quite well, better than the current healthier industry company Crossgen.

Awesome Ent. was hitting a stride when Peters withdrew his support but he also tried very hard to take the characters from ROb Liefeld, characters Rob created. Eventually Rob won the case but the damage was done.

It is speculation like yours that creates the myths that surround people like Rob and John Byrne.

Jason
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-27-2004, 01:20 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Awesome Ent.

Post originally by Shannon Appelcline at 2004-05-27 00:20:14
Converted from Phorums BB System


Let me think. Why would Rob Liefeld have a terrible reputation as an egomaniac and an incompetent?

Oh, of course. It's because of speculation by people like me.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 1996-2006 RPGnet® and individual posters. Compilation copyright RPGnet.