RPGnet
Reviews | Game Index | Forums | Press | Wiki | Columns | Store
 

Go Back   RPGnet Forums > RPGnet Appendix > RPGnet Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-04-2005, 01:00 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
[RPG]: Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay, reviewed by Cake (5/4)

http://www.rpg.net/reviews/archive/11/11191.phtml

Cake's Summary:

Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay is back. Bolder & brighter than ever (in a perilous gothic way, of course) the great dark RPG of Games Workshops Warhammer World is finally with us in its second edition. Death & Glory await!

Go to the full review for more information.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-04-2005, 09:18 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Setting, setting, setting

Post originally by KC at 2005-04-04 08:18:58
Converted from Phorums BB System


One thing that is not clear from the review is if you are an old-school WFRP player. I am picking this up anyway (already ordered), but I was wondering how much the setting has changed. I played it in the old days and loved it, but when I pick up White Dward at my FLGS, I don't always recognize the setting I loved. A lot of hay has been made on the BI boards about doctrinal changes in the setting made to accomodate the Warhammer game. I don't play Warhammer anymore, so I don't know what has happened to the setting in the meanwhile (I have read some of the more recent novels). For example, when people say this is "after the Storm of Chaos", I don't even know what that means.

My question is: Is the flavo(u)r still there?

The new rules will be nice for changing issues with the old ones. But without the originality of the setting, this is just another fantasy RPG.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-04-2005, 09:53 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Setting, setting, setting

Post originally by Cake at 2005-04-04 08:53:49
Converted from Phorums BB System


The setting is still unmistakably WFRP. Although things have changed from the WFRP original setting (the most obvious being Karl Franz is alive) there is nothing a little creative GMing can't resolve - or like me you can just wipe the slate clean, create new characters and start over.

The flavour of the book is bang on: this is the great original setting of the original, just set 20 odd years after the events back then took place - I couldn't cover everything & didn't want the review to be too detailed - so have alook at this as I think it should way lay any fears you might have:

http://www.blackindustries.com/wfrp_downloads.htm

(Incidentally, I've been GMing the original (amongst other games!) since 1986. Once the current v1 campaign ends I will be using v2 without hesitation)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-04-2005, 10:12 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Can I use The Enemy Within campaign with 2ed?

Post originally by Mungo at 2005-04-04 09:12:47
Converted from Phorums BB System


I never had the opportunity to play the 1st ed, but was always interested. I found a cheap copy of the TEW a few years ago and bought it with the idea of someday running it.

But I'm wondering what the issues would be from both a setting and a rules perspective. It sounds like the timeline in the 2nd ed has moved on - does it incorporate events from TEW?

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-04-2005, 11:11 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Can I use The Enemy Within campaign with 2ed?

Post originally by Cake at 2005-04-04 10:11:15
Converted from Phorums BB System


Converting the campaign should be fairly straight forward - it definately should not put you off running one of the best adventures ever written!

Maybe if you try some of the new stuff first with the new edition you will get a better feel for conversion task at hand.

As for the background, there are some inconsistencies between vs1 EW & vs2, but nothing a little creative GM can't cope with - especially as you will have the new background to refer to so can alter anything thats going to cause a problem before it becomes one.

Hope that helps - Cake.

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-04-2005, 11:31 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Attribute scale

Post originally by Dan Davenport at 2005-04-04 10:31:14
Converted from Phorums BB System


Is the human attribute scale still the <u>universal</u> attribute scale? IOW, is the strongest human just as strong as the strongest giant?

--
Dan Davenport
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-04-2005, 11:41 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Setting, setting, setting

Post originally by Jay at 2005-04-04 10:41:38
Converted from Phorums BB System




Cake wrote:
-------------------------------
The setting is still unmistakably WFRP. Although things have changed from the WFRP original setting (the most obvious being Karl Franz is alive) there is nothing a little creative GMing can't resolve - or like me you can just wipe the slate clean, create new characters and start over.

The flavour of the book is bang on: this is the great original setting of the original, just set 20 odd years after the events back then took place - I couldn't cover everything & didn't want the review to be too detailed - so have alook at this as I think it should way lay any fears you might have:

http://www.blackindustries.com/wfrp_downloads.htm

(Incidentally, I've been GMing the original (amongst other games!) since 1986. Once the current v1 campaign ends I will be using v2 without hesitation)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-04-2005, 11:44 AM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Setting, setting, setting

Post originally by Jay Verkuilen at 2005-04-04 10:44:26
Converted from Phorums BB System


[Dammit, sorry about the null post]

>>The setting is still unmistakably WFRP. Although things have changed from the WFRP original setting (the most obvious being Karl Franz is alive) there is nothing a little creative GMing can't resolve - or like me you can just wipe the slate clean, create new characters and start over.<<

Yeah, I'm sure you can use the old setting without any real trouble. It's not as if any GM didn't change things anyway.


>>The flavour of the book is bang on: this is the great original setting of the original, just set 20 odd years after the events back then took place - <<

Hmmm, how much was changed vis a vis things like Bretonnia, which I seem to recall got worked over pretty hard between the background of WFRP and the modern Warhammer battle rules?


>>(Incidentally, I've been GMing the original (amongst other games!) since 1986. Once the current v1 campaign ends I will be using v2 without hesitation)<<

I'd probably just take what I wanted. The magic rules sound pretty groovy, for instance.

Jay
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-04-2005, 03:45 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE: Can I use The Enemy Within campaign with 2ed?

Post originally by WE at 2005-04-04 14:45:01
Converted from Phorums BB System


The game is set some ten years on from the events in TEW. Events have, therefore, moved on. The only major inconsistency would be Empire in Flames - which has an ending very different to the V2 setting. However, Alfred Nunez is writing a new end to TEW campaign that should paper over the gaps between the settings.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-04-2005, 04:00 PM
RPGnet Reviews
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Is it fair to compare... ?

Post originally by Kip at 2005-04-04 15:00:59
Converted from Phorums BB System


Is it fair to compare WH to Midnight? And if so, does anyone have an opinion or preference? I.e., should I wait until Midnight 2e comes out before buying WH?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 1996-2006 RPGnet® and individual posters. Compilation copyright RPGnet.