Quote:
Originally posted by quozl
Thank you for the information! Any chance you could give the Top 10 by profit?
|
In theory I could. However, it's a LOT more effort, and the end result is less meaningful than the two lists above, which are easily done.
For example, suppose I print 10,000 of Book #1 and 2,000 of Book #2, and then I sell 2,000 of each. The books are otherwise identical. Let's say I spend $10,000 on writing and artwork for both, and the printing bill is $1 per copy for #1 (because I'm printing so many) but $2 per copy for #2, and the revenue for both is $10 per copy (just to keep things simple).
For #1, we add $10,000 (writing & artwork) + $10,000 (printing) to get a total cost of $20,000, or $2 per unit. Thus each unit sold generates $8 profit (revenue $10 minus cost of goods $2), and by selling 2000 copies I've made a profit of $16,000.
For #2, we add $10,000 (writing & artwork) + $4,000 (printing) to get a total cost of $14,000...but dividing by 2000 units means $7 per unit. Thus each unit sold generates $3 profit, and by selling all 2,000 I have made a profit of $6,000.
The result is that #1 is FAR more profitable than #2, yes?
Here's the hitch. #1 is more profitable on paper...but it's not generated any free cash flow. I invested $20,000 cash, and I have gotten back $20,000 in return. All my profit is still tied up in inventory. And the way RPG books sell, after these 2000 sold, I may never sell the rest (or at least not enough to generate more than the costs of warehousing and sales). Meanwhile, I'm actually cash flow negative, because I have to pay taxes on the profit, even though I may have no money in the bank!
#2 is far less profitable, strictly speaking, but it's actually a healthier product for a business. I invested $14,000, got back $20,000 -- and the profit of $6,000 is actual cash in the bank.
When someone assures me that a given product is profitable, I always look upon the claim with skepticism. Plenty of companies have driven themselves into the ground while producing a stream of "profitable" products, because they focused on profitability at the expense of cash flow.