Re: [RPG]: Reign, reviewed by Jocelyn Robitaille (5/5)
Jocelyn, this was a phenomenal review. Well-written, informative, and fun to read. Kudos!
__________________ If knowledge of a game's plot would spoil its experience, it isn't a game.
... A player cannot learn of a game's ending without experiencing it, because a game is not a linear object.
—Mike Mearls
Re: [RPG]: Reign, reviewed by Jocelyn Robitaille (5/5)
On the question of whether any kind of 'company' rules have been done before Jocelyn, i'd say Birthright, about 15 years ago. Same idea, very different implementation (at least judging by your review).
Re: [RPG]: Reign, reviewed by Jocelyn Robitaille (5/5)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregStolze
Who prefers to think of it as "promotion" rather than "hype."
Nahhh, it's hype The important thing is that at least you are hyping something that is unique, or at the very least innovative, about the product. What annoys me is when people hype things that aren't new and interesting.
I'm still looking for a good fantasy game myself, so I might give this one a try. It sounds interesting, and it can't be any more disappointing than the other games I've looked at before.
Question for the players:
How fast is it? I am going to run Star Wars using a Reign / Star ORE system, and it looks like it SHOULD run damned fast with regards to combat. Is this true?
__________________
"Just gotta smack em in the fragging mouth."
Suicida Gangrene, Marshall Law
Re: [RPG]: Reign, reviewed by Jocelyn Robitaille (5/5)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Destriarch
I'm still looking for a good fantasy game myself, so I might give this one a try. It sounds interesting, and it can't be any more disappointing than the other games I've looked at before.
This may not belong here but in a separate thread in the Open forum but, what games did you consider and why did they disapoint you? I would really like to know about it.